The Transition From Slap And Ship To Automated Labeling And Production Line Tagging By Michael Putnam, MARKEM Corp.

Moving forward from slap and ship to automated labeling and finally applying RFID tags at the end of production lines can dramatically increase productivity. Getting from here to there can undoubtedly conjure up a variety of questions. Following are some you may be asking yourself:

1. What challenges or problem areas are companies likely to face when implementing label applicators?
   Take projects in stages, and expect to learn a lot. There are many challenges to implementing high-volume RFID tagging, including figuring out tag placement, changing your material handling process, understanding RF interference, managing EPC codes and data, ensuring applicator uptime, and figuring out how tagged products affect your inventory practices and systems. The best way to face these is to take them on one stage at a time. Start with slap and ship, try a limited automated trial, and always think about how you will tag in high volumes down the road. This is easier if you can work with a trusted partner who has done it before.
2. What areas of its operations should a company review in deciding whether or not it is ready to implement RFID label applicators?
   Applicators are needed for high volume tagging and precise tag placement. Many manufacturers are now required to tag products for retailers. Most are doing this today with "slap and ship" systems, using desktop RFID printer encoders. This is a good way to get started, but as volumes increase into hundreds of thousands of cases, it quickly becomes more efficient to use an automated RFID tag applicator. Another key reason to explore automated applicators is because they ensure precise, repeatable tag placement. If your product contains metal or fluids, which interfere with radio waves, this tag placement may actually be required for full tagging compliance.